Literature
review
1. Ordinary
Literature Review:
A comprehensive summary and analysis of existing research on a specific
topic without a strict predefined methodology.
2. Systematic
Literature Review:
A structured and rigorous review that follows a predefined protocol and
systematic search strategy to synthesize existing literature on a particular
research question.
3. Multi-vocal
Literature Review:
An approach that considers and incorporates diverse perspectives or
voices in the literature review process for a more nuanced understanding.
4. Systematic
Mapping Study:
A review that maps and categorizes existing literature on a topic to
identify trends and gaps without necessarily conducting a detailed analysis.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Ordinary
Literature Review:
Advantages:
- Breadth of Coverage: Ordinary
literature reviews are flexible and can cover a broad range of literature,
providing a comprehensive overview of a topic.
- Flexibility: They are less
time-consuming than systematic reviews, allowing for more flexibility in terms
of scope and focus.
Disadvantages:
- Potential Bias: The lack of a
structured methodology may introduce bias in the selection and interpretation
of literature.
- Limited Reproducibility: The
process is less transparent, making it difficult for others to reproduce the
review and verify the findings.
Systematic
Literature Review:
Advantages:
- Minimized Bias: The use of a
systematic approach minimizes selection bias, leading to a more objective
review.
- Reproducibility: The detailed
methodology enhances transparency, allowing others to replicate the review and
validate the results.
Disadvantages:
- Resource-Intensive: Conducting a
systematic review can be time-consuming and requires significant resources.
- Rigidity: The strict protocol
might exclude valuable but non-traditional sources of information.
Multi-vocal
Literature Review:
Advantages:
- Inclusivity: Incorporates diverse
perspectives, providing a more holistic understanding of the topic.
- Enhanced Insight: Recognizing
multiple voices can lead to richer insights and a deeper appreciation of the
complexities involved.
Disadvantages:
- Complex Analysis: Synthesizing
diverse viewpoints may be challenging and can introduce subjectivity.
- Time-Consuming: Involving multiple
perspectives may extend the review process.
Systematic
Mapping Study:
Advantages:
- Landscape Understanding: Helps map
the overall research landscape, identifying gaps and trends.
- Informative for Planning: Useful
in guiding subsequent research endeavors, including systematic reviews or
future studies.
Disadvantages:
- Limited Analysis: Does not provide
an in-depth analysis of individual studies.
- Potential for Overlooking Quality:
Emphasizing quantity over quality may lead to the inclusion of studies with
varying levels of rigor.